
“She's a liar, she's just out for herself,”
he told me.
“I can't disagree,” I replied. “So what about Bernie Sanders?”
“He's a socialist!”
The tone in which my Republican family
member said this was about the same as if he had declared: “He's a bedwetter!”
Being a socialist is apparently
unthinkable. Now granted this family
member is over 60 years old and as a kid, growing up in 1950s America, it was
instilled upon him that the Commies were the worst cretins possible next to
Nazis and Satan worshippers. But still,
when I pressed him for clarification I was expecting something beyond him
raising his hands to his side and simply repeating "a socialist!” as if it was
obvious.
So I said, "What would be so terrible about having a Socialist President - you know, Jesus was a socialist."
What happened next was something reminiscent of Hollywood Western, the moment right before a bar room brawl is about to break out. There was total silence and a look came across his face as if I had just taken a dump on his favorite Bible then wiped my ass with his favorite American Flag. Obviously, Socialism with a capital "S" hadn't even existed during the time of Jesus. However, from what the Bible "documents" about the life of Jesus, his acts and words were very characteristic of Socialist principles. So this was the argument I was prepared to make to my Republican family member, but he just glared at me. No words came from his tater trap.
Knowing that I would come up against nothing but a brick wall in asking him to explain what would be so terrible about having a Socialist President (if in fact Bernie Sanders actually is one), I decided instead to take my question to that fountain of all knowledge - the internet - and pose the question on a variety of political websites. The first interesting reply I received was from a balding middle-aged guy with a fu man chu mustache who declared that “Socialism will make people lazy – they won't have to go out and work for what they got.”
Knowing that I would come up against nothing but a brick wall in asking him to explain what would be so terrible about having a Socialist President (if in fact Bernie Sanders actually is one), I decided instead to take my question to that fountain of all knowledge - the internet - and pose the question on a variety of political websites. The first interesting reply I received was from a balding middle-aged guy with a fu man chu mustache who declared that “Socialism will make people lazy – they won't have to go out and work for what they got.”
This might be true, I conceded. Although, there will be lazy people no matter
what system our country has. There were
probably even lazy slaves on the plantations of Georgia 160 years ago. But to play along and assume that socialism,
or communism, does provide people with more opportunity to be lazy – and that
in fact, people are actually lazier under those systems, the next
question becomes: “Why is that a bad thing?”
My card-carrying Republican family member
probably would have shit a brick from this question, but if you think about it,
isn't the entire goal of capitalism to have an individual obtain so much money
that he or she doesn't have to work anymore?
Or for his or her kids to never have to work? Or to at least have as much leisure time as
they want? Which means that socialism
and capitalism both have essentially the same end goal for an individual. So if that is the case, then why not just
skip the entire “working your ass off for 50 years in the rat race to climb the
company ladder so you can die in a comfortable setting” and go right to the
“provided with everything you need and having all the leisure time you want”
part?

The most common reply I got to this was,
“Well, then no one would do any work and everything would fall apart – like it
did with the Soviet Union.”
The second most common reply was, “Then the
government would completely control everyone's lives, setting up another
environment like that in Nazi Germany.”
And the third most common reply was, “And
how is the government going to pay for all this free shit, Einstein???”
I didn't totally agree with either of the
first two rebuttals. Namely because the
Soviet Union's demise was mainly due to corruption and oppression, which are
traits of human nature no matter what system is at play. And two, the American government would not
completely control everyone's lives like in Nazi Germany. National
Socialism is not the same as just plain old socialism. America has a democratic
system of checks and balances that has ALWAYS prevented a centralized
government from completely taking control.

I know, it sounds pretty boring and
certainly some people would become lazy and just sit around munching on Cheetoz
and watching Maury Povich all day. But
if you have faith in the human spirit, then you know that most people want to
pursue a dream, follow a passion. It
might be painting or volunteering with children or racing dogs or tending a
garden or whatever. But if you believe
in humanity then you believe that a future in which individuals have the
freedom to follow their hopes and dreams and passions is better than one in
which they are locked into an banal life of waking up each day, going to a
mundane job just to pay their bills, and existing as nothing more than a
consumer.
